Reform and succession in Yugoslavia: conditions and legacies (1968-1971)
Keywords:
Yugoslavia, Tito, reform, 1968Abstract
The period from 1968 to 1971 was one of the most complicated moments of the Tito regime and, from the current perspective, is key to understanding some of the events of the 1980s. This period was critical in the History of Yugoslavia because in it there was a comprehensive reformulation of the Yugoslav political system that would become the center of the dispute between the Yugoslav elites of the post-Itist era. In a short period, problems of great magnitude accumulated that revealed the deep divisions that existed in Tito's regime. During these years, the country faced problems that it had never experienced before, such as the increase in unemployment, social opposition to the regime's policies and the problem posed by Tito's succession; and experienced a resurgence of historical problems such as the problematic relationship between Serbian and Croatian nationalism mainly, although not exclusively. The confluence of these problems generated great political instability that concluded with a redefinition of the State, the Party and the economy that, although it served as a provisional solution, ended up being a complicated legacy for the following decade.
References
Fejtö, François (1972) Historia de las democracias populares (1953-1970), Ediciones Martínez Roca, S.A. Barcelona, p.227.
Grupković, Dragutin (1989) Jugoslavija 1918-1988: statistički godišnjak, Savezni zavod za sta- tistiku, Beograd. La cifra total de de visitantes extranjeros pasó de 2.658.000 en 1965 a 5.835.000 en 1975.
Canapa, Marie-Paule (1970) Reforme économique et socialisme en Yougoslavie, Fondation Nationale de Sciences Politiques, Paris
Carter, April (1983) Democratic Reform in Yugoslavia, Frances Pinter, London; Cohen, Lenard J. (1989) The Socialist Pyramid: Elites And Power In Yugoslavia, Tri-Service Press, Oakville.
Blagojević, Borislav T. (1966) “La Constitution Yugoslave de 1963”, Centre Français De Droit Comparé, Paris; Etudes Sur Les Constitutions Actuelles.
Hale, H E. (2006) Democracy or autocracy on the march? The colored revolutions as normal dy- namics of patronal presidentialism, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39, ps. 305-329.
Burg, Steven L. (1983) Conlict and cohesion in socialist Yugoslavia, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, ps. 117-119 y 243-247.
Dimitrijević, Vojin (1995). The 1974 Constitution and Constitutional Process as a Factor in the Collapse of Yugoslavia, In Yugoslavia the Former and Future-Relections by Scholars from the Re- gion, The Brookings Institution and The UN Research Institute for Social Development, Washington and Geneva, eds. Payam Akhavan and Robert Howse. UNESCO, Geneva.
Cohen, L. (1989). The Socialist Pyramid... op. cit., p.156.
Burg, Steven L. (1983). Conlict and cohesion in socialist Yugoslavia, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p. 243.
Nara (1973). “A-385. United States Policy Assessment: Yugoslavia in Mid-1973 (23 July 1973).” Belgrade: US Department of the State.
______ (1971). “233. Editorial Note”. EN Foreign Relations, 1969-1976, Volume XXIX, Yugosla- via, 586-589.
Stanković, Slobodan (1972) “Tito’s Visit to Moscow; How Sincere is Friendship?” En Radio Free Europe Research. Open Society Archives.